The article posits that while transhumanism offers many possibilities, Anglo-Futurism would engage with it critically, ensuring that technological enhancements serve to uphold and advance cultural heritage, community values, and environmental integrity, rather than solely focusing on individual enhancement
You can read more about this in my book, Collected Essays on AngloFuturism Philosophy. It is exclusively published on Amazon.
Here is the link:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Collected-AngloFuturism-Philosophy-Alexander-DAlbini-ebook/dp/B0DPLMHK3C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=2D0ZMV2TZQSUA&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.61rEf3XmLShRm8z13DBJMsjGGKqZ_XOEziPRRmFOztI.FWzsnBfcidCgwJ-idUlpVMj1H_lIFypBWzf8auoerlw&dib_tag=se&keywords=anglofuturism&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1733740587&sprefix=%2Caps%2C171&sr=8-1
Interesting discussion. Difficult. Is consciousness our individuality, our being human? Is the physical being and world necessary? When does a consciousness stop being a human? If I would prefer to be a free consciousness existing as an id inside a computer program or online on internet, would that make me unhuman? Interesting and difficult.