The article portrays Anglo-Futurism's vision of communities as intentional, vibrant places where technology, culture, and purpose intersect to create sustainable, meaningful, and resilient local societies. These communities are envisioned as beacons of a future where traditional values are not lost but are instead the foundation upon which modern life is built.
You can read more about this in my book, Collected Essays on AngloFuturism Philosophy. It is exclusively published on Amazon.
Here is the link:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Collected-AngloFuturism-Philosophy-Alexander-DAlbini-ebook/dp/B0DPLMHK3C/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=2D0ZMV2TZQSUA&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.61rEf3XmLShRm8z13DBJMsjGGKqZ_XOEziPRRmFOztI.FWzsnBfcidCgwJ-idUlpVMj1H_lIFypBWzf8auoerlw&dib_tag=se&keywords=anglofuturism&nsdOptOutParam=true&qid=1733740587&sprefix=%2Caps%2C171&sr=8-1
I don't get how you're going to (theoretically) square the circle of having both a very powerful techno nation state, and strong local communities. Localism means local character, local ideas, local control -- it has to mean something real to be local. How does that work with giant projects like spaceflight? If you're going to get a whole society on board with something huge like that, you need to influence/compel/crush a lot of people into doing it, who might not really want to. Both these ideas have their merits. I don't see how you're getting both.
Thought provoking and well written.
Read Sun Ra's poetry.